Associate Justice Clarence Thomas during the formal group photograph at the Supreme Court in Washington, DC, US, on Friday, Oct. 7, 2022.
- The Supreme Court has refused a request by former Donald Trump lawyer John Eastman to consider a case related to emails he sent in the wake of the 2020 presidential election.
- The most notable thing about the two sentence announcement was that Associate Justice Clarence Thomas recused himself from the decision.
- Thomas is under heightened scrutiny over his financial ties to a conservative billionaire, Harlan Crow.
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday refused to take an appeal by former Trump lawyer John Eastman related to emails of his turned over to the House committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot.
Justice Clarence Thomas was not involved in considering or deciding Eastman's request that the Supreme Court toss lower court rulings related to the emails, the court said in declining to hear the case.
Thomas' recusal, which was not explained, is the first time he has removed himself from a case involving the Jan. 6 insurrection by a mob of supporters of former President Donald Trump.
Eastman is a former law clerk for Thomas, and some of the emails given to the committee by his former employer Chapman University were between Eastman and Thomas' wife, Ginni.
Get Tri-state area news delivered to your inbox. Sign up for NBC New York's News Headlines newsletter.
Thomas is under heightened scrutiny over his financial ties to a conservative billionaire, Harlan Crow, which Thomas failed to disclose for years.
Money Report
His wife played a role in the shadow legal campaign to keep Trump in power after his loss to President Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election.
A Supreme Court spokesperson did not respond to CNBC's inquiry Monday about what prompted Thomas' recusal.
"We're disappointed, of course, that the Court did not accept our request to correct this clear violation of its Munsingwear doctrine," Anthony Caso, a partner at Constitutional Counsel Group who represents Eastman, told CNBC. That doctrine requires the vacating of lower court decisions that have become moot.
